In recent years, the relationship between personal credit scores and access to essential services has sparked widespread debate. While credit history is commonly used to determine loan approvals, credit card limits, and even housing applications, many experts argue that it should not play any role in health insurance decisions. According to health policy analysts, using credit scores in this context is unfair, counterproductive, and dangerous for public well-being.

Here’s a detailed look at why experts believe credit should never influence health insurance.

---

1. Health Care Is a Necessity, Not a Financial Product

Credit scores were designed to evaluate financial risk, not the likelihood of getting sick.
Experts point out that health insurance exists to protect people from medical emergencies—something everyone is vulnerable to, regardless of their financial status.

Using credit data for health coverage:

• Creates barriers to essential care
• Punishes people for past financial struggles
• Turns a human right into a financial privilege

Healthcare advocates emphasize that illness does not discriminate based on credit history—and insurance shouldn’t either.

---

2. Low Credit Scores Often Reflect Hardship, Not Irresponsibility

A poor credit score can result from real-life challenges:

• Job loss
• Medical bills
• Family emergencies
• Low income
• Housing instability

Ironically, many people have bad credit because of high medical costs they couldn’t afford. If insurers use credit scores to raise premiums or deny coverage, it creates a vicious cycle:

Medical debt → bad credit → higher insurance costs → more medical debt

Experts argue this cycle punishes people already struggling and makes it harder for them to recover financially or physically.

---

3. Higher Premiums Based on Credit Are a Form of Discrimination

Consumer rights groups say that tying health insurance rates to credit scores disproportionately affects:

• Low-income families
• Minority communities
• Young adults
• People recovering from financial crisis

These groups already face barriers to healthcare. Credit-based pricing could widen existing inequalities.

Some states in the U.S. already ban the use of credit scores in auto or home insurance—and experts say health insurance should follow the same ethical principle.

---

4. Credit Scores Don’t Predict Medical Risk

Health insurance companies justify risk-based pricing by analyzing factors that indicate potential medical costs.
But research shows no meaningful correlation between a person’s credit score and their likelihood of needing medical care.

Experts highlight:

• Biology and genetics influence health, not financial history
• Lifestyle choices can’t be measured through credit
• Medical emergencies occur unpredictably

Simply put: credit data isn’t a medical tool, so it shouldn’t impact medical coverage.

---

5. Using Credit Can Discourage People From Seeking Care

If people fear being penalized for poor credit, they might avoid getting coverage or delay seeking treatment.
This can lead to:

• Late diagnosis
• More expensive emergency care
• Preventable complications
• Higher long-term healthcare costs for everyone

Public health specialists warn that linking credit and insurance pushes society in the wrong direction—away from preventive care and wellness.

---

Conclusion

Experts across health policy, economics, and consumer rights agree on one point:
Credit scores should not influence health insurance.

Health care is a basic necessity, and access to it should be based on medical need—not financial past. Using credit data only deepens inequality, discourages treatment, and burdens the very people insurance is meant to protect.

To build a fairer healthcare system, experts argue that policies must ensure that everyone, regardless of credit score, can get the coverage they need to stay healthy.